The Parking Today Blog Has Moved!

The Parking Today Blog is now located here. Thanks!

« Indianapolis Goes with a Hybrid – May have a winner | Main | State of the Union »

August 26, 2010

Comments

I am not so sure it is elitist, John. In Japan, this policy has been in place since the 1950s. In the Japanese version of 'proof-of-parking' you don't need to own a parking place. You just need proof that you have rented/leased one.

A key result was a market for leased parking in every neighborhood. Cheap in the suburbs. Expensive in the inner cities.

Preventing car ownership was not the goal. The main aim (just like in the Indian proposals) was to keep parked cars from clogging the streets at night. But it probably does dampen car ownership in the inner cities where such parking is expensive (but anyway, transit is very good in those areas in Japan).

I explain more about the Japan approach to this at http://www.reinventingparking.org/2010/08/japan-style-proof-of-parking.html

All the best

Paul

The comments to this entry are closed.